romanLegion
Active Member
Age isn't the sole factor in reliability; mileage has a heavy hand too. There's a guy with a Mk5 Supra with 75k miles on it -- no issues, just regular maintenance. I also visited the F30 bimmerpost forum, since the F30 3 and 4 series are commuter cars with the B58 -- the only issue was people who blew their turbos overboosting them (so user error). I also haven't seen negatives on the CLAR modular architecture in the several years its been out. The signs seem good that the overall setup will last well past 100k miles with just regular wear and tear.I personally never bring up reliability in the Z vs. Supra debate, in fact I have mentioned several times on this forum that I have personally seen Infiniti Qs with their drivetrains out to get at the turbos. I have a Q60 that I take to the dealership and they said it's common. Then I warn people to remember that the Nissan warranty is typically shorter than the Infiniti.
So, you'll never hear me suggest one is more reliable than the other.
However, you have the typical bravado about new German cars suddenly being "reliable" and that's pure bullshit. Everyone says that, then we look back 10 years and see the truth.
I have and would again lease a German car. But I think you're hitting Hunter Biden's stash if you honestly think a 3 year old car has proven it's reliable in the long run.
That may not matter to you, you may change up cars too frequently to care about 10 years out. But you'd be a damn fool to buy a 10year old BMW and pretend it'll be reliable
I'm not saying all BMWs are reliable, but this platform is passing the smoke test so far.
At least from the engine side of things, Toyota had some say in the B48/B58 as well as the Subaru boxer 4 for the Supra and 86 respectively. I have little doubt their input has offered some benefits.
Time will tell if something major happens at 200k or more.