Yup I guess it's time for plan b. With the markups in my area this thing will be 60k plus. SmhWhere is the extra $10k coming from between a sport and performance? I don't see it. $50k puts it right into a spot where it is against fierce competition. That competition which will beat out the Z in their own ways.
It puts it right smack into competition with cars that are better buys. The M240i is a better GT car, the Mustang and Supra are better Sports Cars. And of course, the Camaro SS 1LE is a very special car that will dismantle this on the track, and likely too will cruise better with it's adjustable suspension.I was reading all the complaints on Sunday in the speculation thread and was glad I wasn't the only one let down by the 10k price jump since I talked about my disappointment in my video lol. I was shocked, I was expecting mid-upper 40s too. I really hope they offer the Sport interior with Performance hardware at some point down the line once the blank check buyers get theirs and the market finally cools off.
Doesn't seem to do well on the track.The only thing that can save the Z for me is if the handling is tight and balanced, no snap oversteer, no nasty understeer. So hard to tune a chassis from the factory get-go. Then, that $50K might be worth it to start with.
Still, nice review by Larry, drifts at the limit, his main issue was with transitions, those electronics kept the Z pointed straight.Doesn't seem to do well on the track.
Really? Could it be that it isn't "shock," as such, but disappointment that the Z has abandoned its core mission statement? Where's the "value argument," here?I don't know why anyone is really shocked at the price.
So what your saying is …you want a Z that’s better than a Supra that’s 10k cheaper?Really? Could it be that it isn't "shock," as such, but disappointment that the Z has abandoned its core mission statement? Where's the "value argument," here?
The base model is essentially a gimmick, priced to be able to market the Z as being a substantially less expensive entry than it actually is (it would require modification to be competitive with the base 3.0 Supra, for instance, and the lack of LSD is flat out dangerous). When Nissan chose to price the car so close to the comparable Supra, it invited more negative comparisons than were necessary. It just doesn't look like a good value and has clearly moved up market.