iztrumental
Well-Known Member
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #108
https://www.motortrend.com/reviews/2024-nissan-z-nismo-first-test-review/
MotorTrend instrumented test on 2024 Z NISMO . First time ive seen traditional car magazine numbers for this car
Z NISMO vs Z Performance 9AT
Weight 3652 VS 3597
0-60 4.2 vs 4.3
1/4 Mile [email protected] vs 12.9 107.6
60-0 Braking 104FT vs 111FT
Figure 8 23.9 secs (0.83G average) vs 25 secs ( 0.75G average)
MotorTrend instrumented test on 2024 Z NISMO . First time ive seen traditional car magazine numbers for this car
Z NISMO vs Z Performance 9AT
Weight 3652 VS 3597
0-60 4.2 vs 4.3
1/4 Mile [email protected] vs 12.9 107.6
60-0 Braking 104FT vs 111FT
Figure 8 23.9 secs (0.83G average) vs 25 secs ( 0.75G average)
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #110
makes sense the 0-60 are so close not much difference from a dig but you can start a little separation in the 1/4. one important bit of context is I was told by some people involved with the NISMO that it really needs the 93 octane to realize the power gains over the performance. im assuming this is a typical motor trend California 91 octane test . so there should be a couple tenths the NISMO should gain on 93
takemorepills
Well-Known Member
That 6 mph trap speed improvement is actually a few car lengths.....
Really not close, you'll know you're losing right away in a regular Z versus the Nismo....
Plus, the dynamics are quite a bit better for the Nismo.....
I actually think Nissan did a good job for a recycled platform......
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #112
for some needed context the 107 trap of the performance Z was from a test done in 2022 and seems like a huge outlier compared to other publications.. Hagerty ,car and driver and a few others were like 115+ with the Z performance automatic and about 111+ with the manual.
its going to vary depending on where the test is done what octane ect.
I havent seen hardly any private owner tests of the NISMO posted yet. saw one owner in FL that ran a 12.4@113ish
its going to vary depending on where the test is done what octane ect.
I havent seen hardly any private owner tests of the NISMO posted yet. saw one owner in FL that ran a 12.4@113ish
Last edited:
bpeckham
Well-Known Member
Your Performance was a 6MT, right? And did this guy stall it at the end? I that that was nearly impossible.
iztrumental
Well-Known Member
FL 4Motion
Active Member
There’s a guy from CFL I’m friends with on IG who ran at the local track here (93 octane). He posted his slip on there, he ran 11.9 at 117mph. Stock.for some needed context the 107 trap of the performance Z was from a test done in 2022 and seems like a huge outlier compared to other publications.. Hagerty ,car and driver and a few others were like 115+ with the Z performance automatic and about 111+ with the manual.
its going to vary depending on where the test is done what octane ect.
I havent seen hardly any private owner tests of the NISMO posted yet. saw one owner in FL that ran a 12.4@113ish
OP
OP
- Thread starter
- #119
That's good to hear. 11.9 is a good benchmark for a car that isn't a straight line car. For perspective a 2009 GTR wasn't much faster back on the day
