jdm-rhd
Well-Known Member
- First Name
- rob
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2021
- Threads
- 76
- Messages
- 3,040
- Reaction score
- 6,587
- Location
- orbiting caprica
- Car(s)
- 95 hardtop supra, 93 widebody rx7, 93 stockish rx7
- Occupation
- videogame tester/skater
I’m saying there isn’t a four door car on the planet that looks better than the S197, let alone the Mustang II, simply based on the fact that the proportions are thrown off by two additional doors. When has anyone ever said “It would look better if they turned it into a four door sedan?”No offense taken. I know the Evo isn't a "tasteful" car. I simply don't care. It's ignorantly fun, looks evil, and rips like a raped ape. Doesn't change the fact that the S197 is trash, and the Evo IX is a MUCH better looking car.
Are you trying to say sedans can't be aesthetically pleasing? Now I can't take YOUR opinion seriously. Already couldn't because you think the 5th gen Mustang is tasteful. There's PLENTY of sedans that look leaps and bounds better than that bland ass, rental car grade S197.
The biologist applauds. Put a (tow) hook in its mouth.Just saw this one one facebook
![]()
Ok now I know you're joking. Out of all the Mustangs available, you go from one of the worst to THE worst possible choice. The Mustang 2? Come on, man. I mean looks are subjective, but some things are just universally known.I’m saying there isn’t a four door car on the planet that looks better than the S197, let alone the Mustang II, simply based on the fact that the proportions are thrown off by two additional doors. When has anyone ever said “It would look better if they turned it into a four door sedan?”
The appearances of the S197 concept and production car were universally praised when they were released and the production car is widely considered to be the best looking Mustang since 1969.
It’s fine if you don’t agree, but you are literally the first person I have encountered in 19 years to argue otherwise.
Allow me to be the second!I’m saying there isn’t a four door car on the planet that looks better than the S197
...
It’s fine if you don’t agree, but you are literally the first person I have encountered in 19 years to argue otherwise.
Yeah, that car looks like it's in the middle of an identity crisis and doesn't know what it wants to be when it grows up. Sorry.Allow me to be the second!
![]()
Lol, that's pretty accurate for down here as well. Most S197's I see on the street look completely shot. When they first came out I do recall them being well received overall, but for me they aged very quickly and not well at all. I wouldn't say I'm a fan of the S197 II either, but the '10-14 is definitely an improvement over the former.I concur, that generation of Mustang was ugly. It looks like trash even on a no-credit-needed used car lot.
I remember the S550 being compared to the Accord when it was first released.Umm getting back on topic I saw this one on facebook.
![]()
That's funny because every Z before the 350 had the black bar going across connecting the tail lights.Umm getting back on topic I saw this one on facebook.
![]()
Yeah, but that black bar on the Mustang goes all the way back to 1969.That's funny because every Z before the 350 had the black bar going across connecting the tail lights.
As does the 240Z. Released in 1969 as a 70 model year. And, a Google image search is showing about half of the '69 mustangs are body colored and not black.Yeah, but that black bar on the Mustang goes all the way back to 1969.
I think it was only on the Mach 1?As does the 240Z. Released in 1969 as a 70 model year. And, a Google image search is showing about half of the '69 mustangs are body colored and not black.