Sponsored

What tires will make this squirrely ass car behave?

Xylander

Well-Known Member
First Name
Guy
Joined
Sep 12, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
114
Reaction score
164
Location
Tallahassee, FL
Car(s)
2024 Nissan NISMO Z
There are people who are able to comfortably keep the car on the edge of traction, and are able to control it when it spins the tires. They understand how to drive the car on the limit of whatever tire is on the car without it getting "squirrely".
Yep, that's my point. A car has a performance envelope. On one end, performance is under utilized, and at the other extreme, total loss of control. A lot goes into reaching that right extreme. Driver input, tires, suspension loading, road conditions, etc.

The magic factor here, is that it's always driver input that results in total loss of control, save for some catastrophic failure like a tire blowout. What a car is made to do, should be able to do, and what it can do are all different things. A car that can hold 1.5 lateral g won't always be able to, depending on the road surface and torque input, for example.

When people are typically younger, they tend to drive with little to no precision. It's always hammer down on the gas, yank hard on the wheel into turns, pop out the clutch, etc. A lot of what I do as a personal instructor is untraining this type of behavior. You can still be very quick with your inputs, but I always train people to be smooth. Whether its throttle application, clutch actuation, or steering input. Always start smooth, then snap if needed. Newton's 1st and 3rd Laws apply here. A car traveling X speed in Y direction with Z weight has a certain amount of inertia. 3rd Law applies (every action produces an equal and opposite reaction) when you unsettle that inertia. If you make snap movements, you get snap results. The more inertia you have, the larger the potential result, etc. To manage this, instead of waiting too long to start a turn in with a snap of the wheel, you start gradually to redirect the momentum, then lean into the turn more. This maintains control. Same is true for straight line acceleration. Start smooth, then snap on. But, just stomping the accelerator before you gain some positive momentum doesn't allow the suspension time to react and absorb the change in load... thus, tires lose traction.

All cars are different. Just because a Mustang on a Nitto can do X, it doesn't mean a Z on the same tire will do the same thing. A turbo profile vs. an NA or supercharged profile all puts power down differently. My best advice is to learn what your car's limit is. If it's say, 60% throttle @ 3,000rpm and it goes up in smoke, then learn to feather that input until it stops blowing the tires off. THEN, research a tire that directly addresses that issue. Simply picking makes and models of tire willy-nilly to see what works is foreign to me. If I need more traction bite, I look at the current tread rating (softness), the tire's optimal temp range, and sidewall construction. If I'm losing traction, I need a softer sidewall maybe... or a softer compound (or both). But, if the expense is too much loss in turning input feel, then I either drive on a happy medium config or I start the expensive work of sorting the suspension.

In most all cases, a custom suspension will fix most all traction issues. It's just stupid expensive. To make a gross example, take a Camaro with a standard suspension and compare it to the Magride equipped versions and note how you can practically launch a ZL1 on the street at 4,000rpm pretty cleanly and how a base 1SS blows the tires off at half the power output at lower RPM on the same tire.

While not as drastic, the difference between a Nismo and a Sport Z are similar. Don't discount the power of suspension upgrades. There's more to making a car go than just HP and tires.
 

ZMidlife

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mike
Joined
May 19, 2025
Threads
15
Messages
114
Reaction score
106
Location
Louisiana
Car(s)
2024 Nissan Z
Occupation
Industrial Gas
Yep, that's my point. A car has a performance envelope. On one end, performance is under utilized, and at the other extreme, total loss of control. A lot goes into reaching that right extreme. Driver input, tires, suspension loading, road conditions, etc.

The magic factor here, is that it's always driver input that results in total loss of control, save for some catastrophic failure like a tire blowout. What a car is made to do, should be able to do, and what it can do are all different things. A car that can hold 1.5 lateral g won't always be able to, depending on the road surface and torque input, for example.

When people are typically younger, they tend to drive with little to no precision. It's always hammer down on the gas, yank hard on the wheel into turns, pop out the clutch, etc. A lot of what I do as a personal instructor is untraining this type of behavior. You can still be very quick with your inputs, but I always train people to be smooth. Whether its throttle application, clutch actuation, or steering input. Always start smooth, then snap if needed. Newton's 1st and 3rd Laws apply here. A car traveling X speed in Y direction with Z weight has a certain amount of inertia. 3rd Law applies (every action produces an equal and opposite reaction) when you unsettle that inertia. If you make snap movements, you get snap results. The more inertia you have, the larger the potential result, etc. To manage this, instead of waiting too long to start a turn in with a snap of the wheel, you start gradually to redirect the momentum, then lean into the turn more. This maintains control. Same is true for straight line acceleration. Start smooth, then snap on. But, just stomping the accelerator before you gain some positive momentum doesn't allow the suspension time to react and absorb the change in load... thus, tires lose traction.

All cars are different. Just because a Mustang on a Nitto can do X, it doesn't mean a Z on the same tire will do the same thing. A turbo profile vs. an NA or supercharged profile all puts power down differently. My best advice is to learn what your car's limit is. If it's say, 60% throttle @ 3,000rpm and it goes up in smoke, then learn to feather that input until it stops blowing the tires off. THEN, research a tire that directly addresses that issue. Simply picking makes and models of tire willy-nilly to see what works is foreign to me. If I need more traction bite, I look at the current tread rating (softness), the tire's optimal temp range, and sidewall construction. If I'm losing traction, I need a softer sidewall maybe... or a softer compound (or both). But, if the expense is too much loss in turning input feel, then I either drive on a happy medium config or I start the expensive work of sorting the suspension.

In most all cases, a custom suspension will fix most all traction issues. It's just stupid expensive. To make a gross example, take a Camaro with a standard suspension and compare it to the Magride equipped versions and note how you can practically launch a ZL1 on the street at 4,000rpm pretty cleanly and how a base 1SS blows the tires off at half the power output at lower RPM on the same tire.

While not as drastic, the difference between a Nismo and a Sport Z are similar. Don't discount the power of suspension upgrades. There's more to making a car go than just HP and tires.
Well said 👏

Do you think the Trucontrol from stillen paired with the stock tuning could cause a boost spike contributing to the issue?
 

Xylander

Well-Known Member
First Name
Guy
Joined
Sep 12, 2025
Threads
1
Messages
114
Reaction score
164
Location
Tallahassee, FL
Car(s)
2024 Nissan NISMO Z
Well said 👏

Do you think the Trucontrol from stillen paired with the stock tuning could cause a boost spike contributing to the issue?
Sure. A person who drives "bad" enough could probably make this issue with a stock car. I'm not talking about the OP here, but what I see a lot of are people who spend their lives in "pedestrian" cars. Stuff like Altimas, Camrys, EcoBoost Mustangs, low hp cars in general. Driving cars like these teach a lot of bad habits. For example, it's common for new drivers who want a "look at me moment" to pull out of a parking lot and punch it before the apex of their turn to get "a wheel." That's because the car isn't powerful enough to bark the tires unless the rear end is unsettled. If you do that with any 400hp car with the traction control off, it'll want to walk around on you.

I personally haven't dealt with the Trucontrol. I'm properly building mine (full engine rebuilt/modification for high boost and a planned 650 whp). Not sayingTrucontrol isn't proper, but it isn't going to give more than 80hp or so. So, on a Nismo, it's 500hp (about 420wheel give or take). If I were a betting man, and I kinda am, I'd wager that it's not the power that's causing the break out, but the throttle input at the torque peak. That tune likely changes the throttle response and is delivering more throttle at peak torque, thus causing traction loss if driven the same way when it was stock.

That's another thing I remind people. When you mod a car, what you drop off and what you pick back up probably isn't the same car. Everything you learned before goes out the window and you have to relearn the car.

The fact is, a lot of folks think that it's both realistic and the best configuration if they can stomp the gas and it just shoots straight with no drama. Take SN95 Mustangs making all of 350hp with giant 305/40/18 rear tires. It will absolutely do that. Problem being to achieve that, they've increased their unsprung mass considerably (reduced braking, reduced acceleration), lowered ther final drive ratio with a taller tire (reduced whp), and have considerably higher friction (which lowers MPG). On most cars through, this configuration is a waste (and slower). Public streets are irregular, so most 400+ hp cars aren't going to be able to uptire to the point where you can do that. So, IMO, it's best to find a solid performing tire and learn to drive it. Michelin, Nitto, Yoko, Bridgestone, Firestone, whatever. Tires are like shoes, find the ones that work best for you and then learn to drive the car.
 
OP
OP
Tranzor Z

Tranzor Z

Well-Known Member
First Name
Steve
Joined
May 6, 2025
Threads
16
Messages
367
Reaction score
428
Location
Texas
Car(s)
2024 Nissan Z
Xylander -

Thanks for all the input. You really spent some time in here lol.

I understand everything you're saying. Basically ease into it. I get that, but I refuse to believe that a car should spin with good tires at a 40+ roll.

I'm not over boosting. Max boost that I have seen was around 19 or 19 and a half.

I am going to look in G2's or pilot sports when the time comes and report back.
 

Katum68

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mr Laurie
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
206
Reaction score
136
Location
Nashua, NH
Car(s)
2024 Z Performance
Occupation
Retired
Xylander -

Thanks for all the input. You really spent some time in here lol.

I understand everything you're saying. Basically ease into it. I get that, but I refuse to believe that a car should spin with good tires at a 40+ roll.

I'm not over boosting. Max boost that I have seen was around 19 or 19 and a half.

I am going to look in G2's or pilot sports when the time comes and report back.
pilot sports worked well on my twin Turboes 370Z (Z1 did the work) 512 RWHP
 

KrackaC8

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christopher
Joined
Nov 23, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Fulshear, TX
Car(s)
2023 Z Performance, 2024 Grand Cherokee, 2023 Wrangler Rubicon
Occupation
VP
Me thinks OP has either never had a turbocharged sports car (especially a modified one...), or needs to check his tire pressure.

Based on his comments, I'd suggest an Evo X or GT-R for the AWD.
 

Katum68

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mr Laurie
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
206
Reaction score
136
Location
Nashua, NH
Car(s)
2024 Z Performance
Occupation
Retired
Me thinks OP has either never had a turbocharged sports car (especially a modified one...), or needs to check his tire pressure.

Based on his comments, I'd suggest an Evo X or GT-R for the AWD.
would love a GT-R for the AWD but my ticket for lottery wasblt the right one. LOL
 

KrackaC8

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christopher
Joined
Nov 23, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Fulshear, TX
Car(s)
2023 Z Performance, 2024 Grand Cherokee, 2023 Wrangler Rubicon
Occupation
VP
would love a GT-R for the AWD but my ticket for lottery wasblt the right one. LOL
GT-R is actually surprisingly disappointing to drive. I was convinced I wanted one until I drove a 2012 from OH to TX in 2013 and realized how boring of a car it was to drive.
 

Katum68

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mr Laurie
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
206
Reaction score
136
Location
Nashua, NH
Car(s)
2024 Z Performance
Occupation
Retired
GT-R is actually surprisingly disappointing to drive. I was convinced I wanted one until I drove a 2012 from OH to TX in 2013 and realized how boring of a car it was to drive.
That is very sad to hear. I shall look into mid engine Corvettes.
 

KrackaC8

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christopher
Joined
Nov 23, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Fulshear, TX
Car(s)
2023 Z Performance, 2024 Grand Cherokee, 2023 Wrangler Rubicon
Occupation
VP
That is very sad to hear. I shall look into mid engine Corvettes.
Look at the C7 instead; my [heavily modded] C8 was boring. The best way I can describe the Z is a hybrid between the S2000 & C7.

C8 braking performance is embarrassing and the interior layout is gross. My wife hated that car from day 1.
 

Katum68

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mr Laurie
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
206
Reaction score
136
Location
Nashua, NH
Car(s)
2024 Z Performance
Occupation
Retired
Look at the C7 instead; my [heavily modded] C8 was boring. The best way I can describe the Z is a hybrid between the S2000 & C7.

C8 braking performance is embarrassing and the interior layout is gross. My wife hated that car from day 1.
You are not helping, I can always upgrade the brakes. The 3 TV screens is a bit much and the navigation sucks. LOL Thanks.
 

KrackaC8

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christopher
Joined
Nov 23, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Fulshear, TX
Car(s)
2023 Z Performance, 2024 Grand Cherokee, 2023 Wrangler Rubicon
Occupation
VP
You are not helping, I can always upgrade the brakes. The 3 TV screens is a bit much and the navigation sucks. LOL Thanks.
Just trying to help! I attempted upgrading the C8 Z51 brakes but was never happy with their performance. GM definitely has to cut costs somewhere to keep the 2020 starting price low.

Beyond that, I wouldn't wish those transmissions upon anyone. Leaks, failures, etc. They only got worse when GM moved assembly from Mexico to Canada too, which is even more surprising.
 

Katum68

Well-Known Member
First Name
Mr Laurie
Joined
Aug 14, 2024
Threads
0
Messages
206
Reaction score
136
Location
Nashua, NH
Car(s)
2024 Z Performance
Occupation
Retired
Just trying to help! I attempted upgrading the C8 Z51 brakes but was never happy with their performance. GM definitely has to cut costs somewhere to keep the 2020 starting price low.

Beyond that, I wouldn't wish those transmissions upon anyone. Leaks, failures, etc. They only got worse when GM moved assembly from Mexico to Canada too, which is even more surprising.
One of the reasons I am looking is the Performance 6 speed transmission. When it gets warmed up, it is very difficult to get into reverse. 1st is very notchyand some others gears also. I've upgraded to a NISMO Clutch and in the process, somehow the transmission got messed up a NISSAN replaced it. I have GTR Clutch fluid init now, per NISSAN, and I s will see how it goes. My stock 370Z manual worked fine with the extra WHP. Smooth etc. This one not so much. I drove for 1.3 and hour, left in the sun for 1.5 hours and the car did NOT want to go into Reverse. I was about a second away from getting it towed when it went in. Not happy with it.
 

KrackaC8

Well-Known Member
First Name
Christopher
Joined
Nov 23, 2025
Threads
8
Messages
973
Reaction score
1,314
Location
Fulshear, TX
Car(s)
2023 Z Performance, 2024 Grand Cherokee, 2023 Wrangler Rubicon
Occupation
VP
One of the reasons I am looking is the Performance 6 speed transmission. When it gets warmed up, it is very difficult to get into reverse. 1st is very notchyand some others gears also. I've upgraded to a NISMO Clutch and in the process, somehow the transmission got messed up a NISSAN replaced it. I have GTR Clutch fluid init now, per NISSAN, and I s will see how it goes. My stock 370Z manual worked fine with the extra WHP. Smooth etc. This one not so much. I drove for 1.3 and hour, left in the sun for 1.5 hours and the car did NOT want to go into Reverse. I was about a second away from getting it towed when it went in. Not happy with it.
Redline MT-85 GL-4 transmission fluid
 

trackratZ

Well-Known Member
First Name
August
Joined
Mar 23, 2021
Threads
95
Messages
2,837
Reaction score
5,365
Location
So CA
Car(s)
25 Z Perf 6MT, Cayman S (track), Tesla Model Y, Gladiator, MX5 Club (autox)
Occupation
Software security
GT-R is actually surprisingly disappointing to drive. I was convinced I wanted one until I drove a 2012 from OH to TX in 2013 and realized how boring of a car it was to drive.
I concur, really wanted a GT-R and test drove a couple a few years back, but...too much tech, felt heavy, and not engaging to drive, disconnected feeling. OTOH this spare car I have is way too much fun, light, zippy, splits duties with the Z for a daily. Just enough power to use all the gears thru redline without getting into trouble. :)

IMG_1526.webp
 
 






Top