MHockey17
Well-Known Member
- Joined
- May 7, 2022
- Threads
- 0
- Messages
- 184
- Reaction score
- 259
- Location
- Pennsylvania, USA
- Car(s)
- '18 Nissan 370Z NISMO, '01 Mitsu Eclipse GT
I’m having a hard time putting much stock in these stat comparisons due to all the variation between reviewers. Similar to the variation in dyno outputs, we've now seen MT report a 12.9s @ 107mph quarter mile, while C&D previously reported 12.6s @ 115mph, and as low as 12.3s @ 116mph from Hagerty. Pretty stark variations IMO, and I can’t imagine all of that difference is due to pre-production unit related reasons; the only constant in these stat comparisons is the Supra (and most other competitors) always seem to post faster relative times.
Regardless, unless you simply must have great numbers for bragging rights, or a primal need to race every stranger that pulls up at a stop light, I feel it’s important to also consider how the car will align to your preferences & needs in a vacuum.
In most reviews I’ve seen, the consistent takeaway seems to be that it’s not a track ready car (in stock form), but has plenty of power, good amenities, great style, and is fun & engaging to drive.
As the market stands currently, the Perf Z is definitely overpriced. Though as far as performance numbers go, the jury is out for me until Nissan releases a NISMO model.
Regardless, unless you simply must have great numbers for bragging rights, or a primal need to race every stranger that pulls up at a stop light, I feel it’s important to also consider how the car will align to your preferences & needs in a vacuum.
In most reviews I’ve seen, the consistent takeaway seems to be that it’s not a track ready car (in stock form), but has plenty of power, good amenities, great style, and is fun & engaging to drive.
As the market stands currently, the Perf Z is definitely overpriced. Though as far as performance numbers go, the jury is out for me until Nissan releases a NISMO model.