then why watch them at all?
"Not a lot of weight" doesn't mean I see them as having absolutely no value. And there is always the possibility someone will buck the whitewash trend, as in fact Jason Cammisa does above. I expect Savagegeese will be frank as well.
For what it's worth, I never drink the kool-aid and always call things how I see them, and in my experience car companies have no problems as long as the criticisms are fair. I've only seen car companies get upset if the reviewer lies, overly exaggerates a negative, or spreads inaccurate information (intentionally or unintentionally) despite sitting in an hour long presentation with the correct info. Or if they're reckless of course.
Yes, maybe I was a bit too cynical there, there have to be characteristics that only reveal themselves with more and varied seat time and in side by side comparisons. As Mark states himself in his Savagegeese piece today, he can't say yet what might annoy him about street driving the new Z as he hasn't done any.
But you were one of the ones that said you lived these guys and it’s the review to watch…now you don’t like the price are you saying they don’t know their stuff.
Huh? Jack said himself in the review that he hadn't done any street driving with the Z and so couldn't offer much on that front - and has stated here that more would be coming later. The normal Savagegese review includes that element which obviously makes it more useful.
So you totally ignore the part where they say it’s totally worth it and it has more connectivity than most more expensive cars…just cherry picking what you want to hear?
Whatever, you obviously can’t afford it, so have thrown the toys out with the bath water….ill just enjoy my car, you dont want one, good…less on the road to make them more unique
