Interesting take. I Think the turbine side is "oversized" reducing EMP to near 1 or <1. This in theory should keep charge air and back pressure ideal.I think the 60s is bad choice for these engines. You would have to run high boost to get decent power which means more heat for an engine that already struggling with cooling.
Me personally I will go with the 80s or wait for full frame kit (hopefully CZP release their G-25 550 kit soon). I would trade delayed boost for lower pressure and temp.
I would wait to see what CZP has coming out, which may be a better option.Interesting take. I Think the turbine side is "oversized" reducing EMP to near 1 or <1. This in theory should keep charge air and back pressure ideal.
Now it won't be something to push past 550-600whp. Plenty for me and being a 6spd
You will always want more after awhile. Trust meInteresting take. I Think the turbine side is "oversized" reducing EMP to near 1 or <1. This in theory should keep charge air and back pressure ideal.
Now it won't be something to push past 550-600whp. Plenty for me and being a 6spd