Kbl911
Well-Known Member
Ultimately, this is where I fall on the matter - it's the classic cost-of-ownership consideration. Viewed with a wide lens, both vehicles are quick (not really "fast," since that would be a top speed measurement and neither is particularly spectacular in that arena). The Supra is a much more capable performer and, with both in stock setup, no Z owner should really want to see one at a stoplight; I really question its overall long term reliability, however. The BMW underpinnings concern me, not necessarily because I fear they will instantly fail, but because repairs tend to be incredibly costly overall once they do.they both have their positives and negatives.
maybe another question that we should ask is which would you rather have? let's look at twist of the classic choice triangle...
1. fast
2. reliable
3. cheap to maintain
you can't have all 3, so pick 2
My Z is my daily driver so I will always have to err on the side of general reliability and eventual cost of ownership. I wouldn't be modifying it (at least not in any mechanical/tuning capacity) so the engine's potential for upgrade truly isn't a factor. I think lots of buyers will just want to buy the car and drive the thing rather than autocross it

That's just me.