Longhorn2020
Well-Known Member
The crappy tires definitely kept it from dipping into the high 3's.Yes, and with decent tires it should be in the high 3 secs.
The crappy tires definitely kept it from dipping into the high 3's.Yes, and with decent tires it should be in the high 3 secs.
Don't know how much the clutch would have liked that... No judgement though. Manual sports cars just aren't made for traffic... so we do what we need to do to get by.I might get shot down for this suggestion, but years ago I drove a HSV Monaro (in Australia) with a 5.7L V8 and a heavy 6 speed ZF manual transmission. I dealt with the twitchiness in heavy stop start traffic by using second gear rather than first. Car had plenty of power and it just made it so much more manageable in peak hour.
Yep. I expect you are correct.Don't know how much the clutch would have liked that... No judgement though. Manual sports cars just aren't made for traffic... so we do what we need to do to get by.
Never had any issue daily* driving my manual 200sx.Manual sports cars just aren't made for traffic
Yes, they're quicker if all you need to do is pointlessly shove your foot to the floor for a fast 0-60 time, but in any real world driving they don't, and can't, always pick the correct gear to use for the current circumstances.here is a great video explaining why the auto's are so much quicker now
I agree, but neither can a "manual man" always pick the correct gear for their situation...example money shift!...Yes, they're quicker if all you need to do is pointlessly shove your foot to the floor for a fast 0-60 time, but in any real world driving they don't, and can't, always pick the correct gear to use for the current circumstances.
They can if they're a competent driver ... which any race driver should be once they've had practice time on a new track.I agree, but neither can a "manual man" always pick the correct gear for their situation...example money shift!
The point he doesn't mention is that the automatics have a larger number of gears. Using his example a mustang gt 5.0 manual is a six speed and the automatic a 10 speed. So assuming the automatic isn't going to be geared significantly higher in final drive, the ratio's and gaps are going to be different. Same for the Porsche, 6 versus 8. Probably why the gap is lower.It's not that we can't shift fast enough, here is a great video explaining why the auto's are so much quicker now.
Agreed and you'd think in the real world it would be a lot closer when driving them back to back.The point he doesn't mention is that the automatics have a larger number of gears. Using his example a mustang gt 5.0 manual is a six speed and the automatic a 10 speed. So assuming the automatic isn't going to be geared significantly higher in final drive, the ratio's and gaps are going to be different. Same for the Porsche, 6 versus 8. Probably why the gap is lower.
You should tell that to Charles Leclerc, the F1 driver that made mistake in the lead and cost himself the French Grand Prix this weekend. The fact is you are going to make more mistakes on track vs just street driving as you're pushing the car way harder in every sense...I'm sure you know this though.They can if they're a competent driver ... which any race driver should be once they've had practice time on a new track.
I agree the mistakes can absolutely be bigger, like putting all 4 wheels off the track but you do everything you can to avoid those big ones. I was talking about the little mistakes like not apexing the corner just right because you're carrying to much speed or missing an upshift when you're making a pass, ext. The small stuff that just inevitably happens to ruin your best laps on a road course. I missed 2 upshifts(both into 3rd) last month at Sebring and I'm still thinking about them, can't remember the last time I missed an upshift into 3rd on the street.^ I don't know about "more mistakes", but they're certainly "bigger" mistakes due to the speed, being on public view, etc.