I suspect they're running some shit 91. Can atest that 91 significantly slowers the VR30DDTT. It's hard to trust journalists, when they don't provide their methodology for getting the cars ready to test.
Bigger brakes are really only better for getting to the threshold of your tires sooner and keeping the brakes cool longer. If you are not using your brakes in a track-like way, standard caliper brakes have no trouble stopping as hard as a Brembo kit, just with more pedal force.
I strictly use 93 E10 from Kwik Trip, Costco, or BP, so brand agnostic. I've used 91 once because of fuel starve, and that caused a significant reduction in timing.
I ran 65°, 80°, and 90° track days in like 85% humidity. Didn't notice much difference on following 90° track days with HX, also at...
Have used the TruControl v1 non-NISMO on Map7 at multiple track days. I've never noticed a significant performance dropoff. This was before I installed CZP HX too.
If there's a die hard truck guy on here, they can disagree, but I believe the consensus in the half-ton space is that they all are having considerably more issues than ever before. The space could use an old school truck.
Both Dunlops for the Nismo are 200TW, the older GT 600 and new Sport Maxx RS.
They definitely don't compare since they're run flat tires due to no spare.
Edit: for the Sport Maxx RS, I'll see if they're decent in October.
https://conceptzperformance.com/nismo-lm-rs1-wheels-19-95105-5x1143-available-in-anthracite-black-bronze-4030s-l9xxxx_p_77881.php
See the chart on the bottom of the page.
The way your question was worded made it hard to know what exactly you were looking for.
I'm not sure your pace, but I would anticipate at minimum 15 hours of track time. Likely 20 hours.
They're asymmetrical, so you can rotate them left <-> right between track days.
Additionally, I have driven the car from the track in torrential rain over construction site road conditions and...
Basically, if someone bumps the camera, it has no way to know it's positioned wrong. So, they require it to avoid liability.
Also, there is WPF, it's shit, but I still use it now. Better than a windshield every year.
Id be concerned they're doing a bait and switch price at this low. Like "after insurance" as the cheapest I was able to find after 10 quotes was $900, no insurance claim.